Thought Provoking, Insightful News & Analysis
|
|
Thought Provoking, Insightful News & Analysis |
||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Breaking
News! Monday, July 24, 2006! The Dark Side Of The Internet: There Is A Growing Underworld Of People Publishing &
-A Meltingclocktimes.com editorial Recently as I was surfing the web I accidentally hit on a random page and made a startling discovery. It is shocking and maybe you know something about it. There is an underworld of people publishing and exchanging photos of poodles. It shocked me to see peoples' horrid pet poodle photos. To think people actually own and live with these little rat dogs--that is bad enough. But to subject other people to this repulsiveness and publish the photos on the internet--oh, the horror! Why is it that there is pornography blocking software, but no poodle blocking software? Many internet sites discourage naked humans and people engaged in sexual acts. Google, the world's biggest internet advertising service, does not permit ads on porno sites. But there are no restrictions for anything on poodle sites. Also, content blocking software does nothing to hide children and unwitting internet surfers from revolting pet poodles. How dare we allow deranged poodle owners with their warped fetish for midget mutants to post photos on the public computer networks for all to see. Posting pictures of poodles must stop. All content blocking software must include poodle blocking safeguards. Right now you can go blogspot.com and click to see a random blog. You can safeguard yourself from getting a blog devoted to bukakes or S&M. Likewise you can go to stumbleupon.com and click “stumble” to see a random blog, or web site. If it is X rated you can opt out if you aren't interested. However, there are no safeguards to prevent anyone from getting a blog with pictures of poodles! Readers, we must stop this indecency! Please write to your congressman
and senators and urge them to enact legislation to protect unwitting
people from having to see photos of people's pet poodles. Just recently
the Congress passed a bill increasing the fines for whoever the censors
deem as indecent. I heard little outcry at this outrageous puritanical
reaction that stemmed from Janet Jackson's openhearted Superbowl exposure
of her beautiful bazookas. However, what happens if an unsuspecting
person is browsing the internet and accidentally clicks on a photo of
someone's pet poodle. Why are there no laws against this kind of horror?
No one is going to get fined for subjecting someone to a poodle. We
at Meltingclocktimes.com think this is an outrage!
|
|||||||||||||||
 |
